Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by alexd on July 4, 2008, 5:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options of the commands, I noticed that it is in fact identical to a Dell Powerconnect 3324 [amongst others], but not identical to IOS. So, are Dell re-badging Linksys? Linksys re-badging Dell? Or Linksys and Dell both using the same ODM? Seems unlikely. Surely Linksys would be using Cisco's in-house experience rather than going out to an ODM like Marvell? -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx)
22:29:29 up 2 days, 8:56, 3 users, load average: 0.03, 0.50, 0.38
Convergence, n: The act of using separate DSL circuits for voice and data | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Doug McIntyre on July 5, 2008, 12:48 am
Please log in for more thread options >This little beastie has a very Cisco-esqe CLI, and after googling a few
>of the commands, I noticed that it is in fact identical to a Dell >Powerconnect 3324 [amongst others], but not identical to IOS. So, are >Dell re-badging Linksys? Linksys re-badging Dell? Or Linksys and Dell >both using the same ODM? Seems unlikely. Surely Linksys would be using >Cisco's in-house experience rather than going out to an ODM like Marvell? Linksys is all on their own. I haven't seen much if any cross over from classic cisco to linksys and vice-versa. To me, it seems that Cisco bought linksys purely to get their name more well known in consumer gear that is likely stocked at BestBuy and not much more.. I've heard from elsewhere that HP designs/OEMs the insides of the Dell switches. The CLI in the Dell is different than the HP. Both of their feature sets are very simular, but then again, most switches in that class are very close as well. Linksys had their own design department before the aquisition and I'd imagine that it continues to be self-sufficient outside of Cisco. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by alexd on July 5, 2008, 5:08 am
Please log in for more thread options On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:48:46 +0000, Doug McIntyre wrote:
> Linksys had their own design department before the aquisition and I'd
> imagine that it continues to be self-sufficient outside of Cisco. I suppose if you're turning over ~$30B a year, then saving a few million here and there on "synergies" isn't worth the effort. -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx)
10:06:53 up 2 days, 20:33, 3 users, load average: 0.75, 0.39, 0.21
Convergence, n: The act of using separate DSL circuits for voice and data | ||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Linksys SFE2000P - not really a Cisco | July 4, 2008, 5:44 pm |
| Linksys GIG v's Cisco Gig | October 14, 2006, 2:01 pm |
| telnet through Linksys to Cisco | April 11, 2006, 4:56 pm |
| cisco 7960 POE on linksys SRW 244 P | August 2, 2006, 9:30 am |
| Cisco Pix 501 and Linksys router | July 6, 2005, 4:34 pm |
| VPN between Cisco 837 and Linksys wireless router. | February 14, 2005, 4:58 pm |
| Cisco 837 IPSEC Linksys WAG54g | July 11, 2005, 5:37 pm |
| Linksys BEFVP41 to Cisco Pix 506E | July 21, 2005, 7:50 am |
| Linksys Router < -- > Cisco PIX 506e | September 22, 2005, 9:02 am |
| cisco CP-7920 with linksys AP on CCME | September 22, 2006, 3:08 pm |
| Cisco PIX 515E and Linksys WRV 200 VPN Tunnel | November 28, 2006, 4:09 am |
| Cisco VPN client and Linksys VPN compatibility? | February 5, 2007, 11:41 pm |
| Which ports to forward on my linksys to cisco | February 21, 2007, 12:32 pm |
| Cisco 2621 w/Firewall IOS and Linksys WRV54G | March 16, 2006, 10:46 am |
| Cisco 1121G AP and Linksys wireless clients | October 10, 2006, 8:39 pm |

Linksys SFE2000P - not really a Cisco
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 




