|
|
|
Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||
|
Posted by AN on July 1, 2009, 9:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options
2950 switch do the same thing as a pure layer 3 switch such as a 3750? | ||||||||||
|
Posted by bod43 on July 1, 2009, 9:54 pm
Please log in for more thread options Yes. Maybe. Perhaps. No. 3750 has 1,000s or 10s of 1,000s or more, throughout than a 26xx software router. Router will have a wider variety of facilties. What throughput do you need? What IOS features do you wish to use? | ||||||||||
|
Posted by AN on July 1, 2009, 10:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options I am not concerned about through put as I am bring up a new 4 person office
on a t-1 MPLS circuit. I don't want to spend the jack on a 3750 L3 switch when I have a few 2650xm's with t-1 cards and 2950's laying around collecting dust. I have not touched a router in 4 years since I got rid of my NxT1 private lines and went with MPLS with ethernet handoffs that land on a vlan on my L3 switches. >> Would a router on a stick configuration with a 2650xm dot1q trunked to a
>> 2950 switch do the same thing as a pure layer 3 switch such as a 3750? >
> Yes. > > Maybe. > > Perhaps. > > No. > > 3750 has 1,000s or 10s of 1,000s or more, throughout > than a 26xx software router. > > Router will have a wider variety of facilties. > > What throughput do you need? > What IOS features do you wish to use? | ||||||||||
|
Posted by flamer die.spam@hotmail.com on July 1, 2009, 11:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options > I am not concerned about through put as I am bring up a new 4 person offi=
ce
> on a t-1 MPLS circuit. =A0I don't want to spend the jack on a 3750 L3 swi=
tch
> when I have a few 2650xm's with t-1 cards and 2950's laying around
d of
> collecting dust. =A0I have not touched a router in 4 years since I got ri= > my NxT1 private lines and went with MPLS with ethernet handoffs that land=
on
> a vlan on my L3 switches.
> > > > >> Would a router on a stick configuration with a 2650xm dot1q trunked to=
a
> >> 2950 switch do the same thing as a pure layer 3 switch such as a 3750?
>
> > Yes.
>
> > Maybe.
>
> > Perhaps.
>
> > No.
>
> > 3750 has 1,000s or 10s of 1,000s or more, throughout
> > than a 26xx software router. >
> > Router will have a wider variety of facilties.
>
> > What throughput do you need?
> > What IOS features do you wish to use? yeah of course, it will work just fine. Disadvantages are the bandwidth of the single link going to the switch may get saturated. I take it this is just for routing VLAN's, have to also ask the question why you need VLAN's for a 4 person office? flamer. | ||||||||||
|
Posted by AN on July 2, 2009, 12:30 am
Please log in for more thread options Have db servers, their own internet circuit, and hw ap's, along with mgmt
vlans, and to follow a topology standard and subnet numbering plan. If you are looking for something to be critical about I will give you the IT Director, the Application Engineers and the Security Engineers contact info you can criticize their asshole requirements. I just work, get my check so I can get pussy and drink beer and enjoy fun things not IT things... I don't waste good life quality trying to be Mr Shining Star IT fucktard who know everything better than anyone else. > I am not concerned about through put as I am bring up a new 4 person
> office > on a t-1 MPLS circuit. I don't want to spend the jack on a 3750 L3 switch > when I have a few 2650xm's with t-1 cards and 2950's laying around > collecting dust. I have not touched a router in 4 years since I got rid of > my NxT1 private lines and went with MPLS with ethernet handoffs that land > on > a vlan on my L3 switches. > > > > >> Would a router on a stick configuration with a 2650xm dot1q trunked to
> >> a > >> 2950 switch do the same thing as a pure layer 3 switch such as a 3750? >
> > Yes.
>
> > Maybe.
>
> > Perhaps.
>
> > No.
>
> > 3750 has 1,000s or 10s of 1,000s or more, throughout
> > than a 26xx software router. >
> > Router will have a wider variety of facilties.
>
> > What throughput do you need?
> > What IOS features do you wish to use? yeah of course, it will work just fine. Disadvantages are the bandwidth of the single link going to the switch may get saturated. I take it this is just for routing VLAN's, have to also ask the question why you need VLAN's for a 4 person office? flamer. | ||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| L3 switch vs. router on stick | July 1, 2009, 9:46 pm |
| Router on a stick | November 1, 2005, 1:59 pm |
| Router on a stick | September 5, 2006, 5:54 pm |
| Router on a stick and broadcasts | August 16, 2006, 1:14 pm |
| Router on a stick w/o secondary IP | July 4, 2005, 8:59 am |
| Router on the stick configuration problem | October 23, 2005, 11:02 am |
| CatOS router on a stick configuration | January 22, 2010, 11:27 am |
| PIX on a Stick? | July 30, 2005, 1:54 am |
| Nat on Stick | March 1, 2006, 3:30 pm |
| CAT6509 router or L3 switch? alternative Low-end L3 switches/router? | August 16, 2006, 3:05 am |
| Nat-In-A-Stick Problem | September 16, 2006, 8:58 am |
| NAT on a stick, Cisco 2516 and DHCP... | July 21, 2005, 10:39 pm |
| matched memory stick pair for cisco 3825 | August 9, 2006, 10:40 am |
| mac btw router and switch | November 10, 2005, 3:58 am |
| Switch & Router IP Route | March 8, 2006, 5:04 pm |

L3 switch vs. router on stick
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 






> 2950 switch do the same thing as a pure layer 3 switch such as a 3750?