|
Posted by netproj on December 29, 2005, 1:29 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I am reviewing the QoS config of a router on our network and came
across this,
interface Serial2/0.804 point-to-point
description 1536kb pvc to Chicago
bandwidth 1536
ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 255.255.255.252
ip summary-address eigrp 646 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 180
traffic-shape rate 153600 76800 76800 1000
frame-relay interface-dlci 804 IETF
The remote PVC is a 1.5 Mbps CIR PVC at (Chicago), locally it is a
45Mbps CIR PVC on a DS-3 port.
If we have the target rate is set to 1.536 what benefit is the burst
and excess burst values, practically speaking you can not burst above
the remote port speed, shouldn't we lower the target rate to (1.536
Mbps - 76.8Kbps - 76.8 Kbps).
Thanks in advance.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Is this traffic shaping valid or make sense? | December 29, 2005, 1:29 pm |
| Does the configuration my ISP provided make sense? If so, how should I configure my Cisco switches to properly utilize the Bridge being implemented with a connection to the internet at each building? | January 14, 2007, 1:28 pm |
| How does typical ISP traffic shaping/bandwidth limiting work ? Do ISP's allow bursty traffic per second ? | January 19, 2006, 3:50 pm |
| traffic-shaping limit ftp traffic | October 7, 2005, 11:51 am |
| Traffic-shaping traffic with precedence 2 | June 12, 2008, 5:05 am |
| Traffic-shaping traffic with precedence 2 | June 12, 2008, 11:14 am |
| Make traffic for test the link | July 11, 2006, 4:48 pm |
| Cisco 801 how to make it dial when there is traffic for a certain ip address | June 19, 2005, 6:01 am |
| Re: QoS - Traffic Shaping | May 29, 2005, 11:39 am |
| What is better for traffic shaping? | April 6, 2006, 6:15 am |
| Traffic policing or shaping | August 1, 2005, 2:51 am |
| QoS and Traffic shaping across MPLS? | October 5, 2005, 10:16 am |
| Traffic shaping 3560 | October 2, 2006, 7:19 am |
| Framerelay Traffic Shaping | December 2, 2008, 8:49 am |
| Blocking/Shaping Voip traffic | August 9, 2005, 12:32 pm |