Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||
|
Posted by dt1649651@yahoo.com on April 22, 2008, 3:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options ipsec gateway. This l2tp/ipsec is for mobile devices ( Windows mobile 2003 premium or 2005 ) which support by default l2tp/ipsec but not cisco vpn client. I have no problem with configuration of site-to-site with ezvpn or of site-to-site with l2tp/ipsec gateway. But when I let all three to work together, it seems there is some conflict between the l2tp/ipsec and ezvpn. If the crypto map command for ezvpn has smaller order number then ezvpn clients work, and l2tp/ipsec client cannot make the connection. If the crypto map command for l2tp has smaller order number then l2tp/ ipsec clients work, and ezvpn clients can make the connection but go nowhere. site-to-site ipsec is still happy no matter what crypto map numbers of l2tp or ezvpn are. Is that because both l2tp/ipsec and ezvpn in this configuration have dynamic peers so they fight each other ? Thanks, DT | ||||||||||

Is the crypto map order important ? Or is that between ezvpn and l2tp/ipsec ?
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 