IPSEC Tunnel - LAN TO LAN - 3DES - SHA1 - 3K CONCENTRATOR to BEFSX41 ( LINKSYS )
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by none@set.yet on September 11, 2006, 12:54 pm
Please log in for more thread options SEV=4 IKE/119 RPT=222 x.x.x.x Group [x.x.x.x] PHASE 1 COMPLETED 2006-09-10 02:00:50 Local6.Warning 192.168.1.250 10616 09/10/2006 02:00:50.350 SEV=3 IKE/134 RPT=19 x.x.x.x Group [x.x.x.x] Mismatch: Configured LAN-to-LAN proposal differs from negotiated proposal. Verify local and remote LAN-to-LAN connection lists. 2006-09-10 02:00:50 Local6.Notice 192.168.1.250 10618 09/10/2006 02:00:50.350 SEV=4 IKE/119 RPT=223 x.x.x.x Group [x.x.x.x] PHASE 1 COMPLETED notice the local6.warning Is there a difference in the way the Linksys and Cisco devices handle the Phase I ISAKMP negotiation parameters? This is syslog snipet from 3K concentrator doing lan-to-lan session to a remote site on a dsl connection with a BEFSX41 -- --------------------------------- --- -- - Posted with NewsLeecher v3.7 Final Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet ------------------- ----- ---- -- - | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Walter Roberson on September 11, 2006, 1:43 pm
Please log in for more thread options My reading of that would be that the access-list on the Cisco side might not match the gui-entered destinations on the BEFSX41 side. | ||||||||||||||||
>2006-09-10 02:00:50 Local6.Warning 192.168.1.250 10616 09/10/2006
>02:00:50.350 SEV=3 IKE/134 RPT=19 x.x.x.x
>Group [x.x.x.x] Mismatch: Configured LAN-to-LAN proposal differs from
>negotiated proposal. Verify local and remote
>LAN-to-LAN connection lists.