Help requested with setting static IP Cisco PIX 501
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Maximus Prime on June 3, 2008, 7:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options I am able to access the internet from my network when the PIX is set to its factory default configuration as dynamic on the outside interface, but when I set it to static and put the IP and subnet mask, nothing. Also using the wizard does not work. I am guessing it has something to do with the NAT. I use the PDM to access the PIX. I am not using the PIX as a DHCP server. Thanks | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Maximus Prime on June 5, 2008, 10:53 pm
Please log in for more thread options but do not want them to have to use Cisco VPN client. How do I set up the PIX (using PDM) to allow that to pass through if I have only one static IP. Set the server as a static IP and configure the PIX to allow connections to it through the port (3389)? This is less secure but it is easier for the everyday user. ANY thoughts would be appreciated | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Walter Roberson on June 27, 2008, 12:47 am
Please log in for more thread options >I have an answer to your question:
But you didn't answer how to do the task in the PDM, as requested by the original poster multiple times, and later reinforced by the original poster. >To really get the most out of your connection, I recommend looking into the
>newer and more advanced ASDM. A higher version of the PIX OS would be >required for that. It is just something to look into. Not possible on the original poster's PIX 501. >Here is the commands which you would enter from the console, presuming that
>your interfaces are named "outisde" and "inside" and your server was at >192.168.1.4: > static (inside,outside) tcp interface 3389 192.168.1.4 3389 netmask
>255.255.255.255 That command and the corresponding (non-obvious) access-list entry have been posted numerous times before, and could have been found by googling the group for PIX 3389 . The original poster was pointed to that source of information. > I am not aware of any accomplishment
Scott, the poster asked specifically for the PDM steps for this task. You had an opportunity to review the complete thread from a retrospect and take your time and answer the question asked -- i.e., the exact PDM steps -- click on this toolbar, select that entry, go down to the 7th line, go over to the third column, type in this, click save, go through these other PDM pages in this sequence, doing thus-and-thus. Why did *you* not answer in terms of the PDM as requested and reinforced? You probably would have had to go through the PDM yourself and figure out and test the steps (since some of the PDM logic for this task is back-assward compared to what is really going on in the PIX), and you then would have had to write it all up in terms of this-menu-bar and that sub-entry and fill in this field and go back up and over to this other page, and so on -- but what stopped you from doing just that? You work for aciscocompany, so you would have access to an appropriate device, so it wasn't due to lack of opportunity. You were chiding others for not answering the question, so why not actually -answer- the question? Did your decision as to the form and extent of your answer just happen to have anything to do with there being limits on the amount of effort you are willing to go through in order to answer a question "on your own time", as a volunteer? | ||||||||||||||||
