HSRP and GLBP
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Drx on February 9, 2006, 2:56 am
Please log in for more thread options routers, with different vitual IP addresses, one for HSRP and one for GLBP? Thanks! | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by ciscodagama@gmail.com on February 11, 2006, 11:25 am
Please log in for more thread options have similar functionality, it is not clear when configuring both would be useful. Also, for hosts on the LAN where you have this pair of routers, what you configure as the default gateway? Will it be the HSRP virtual IP address or will it be the GLBP virtual IP address? Having said that, I think if you configured GLBP and HSRP together, it would probably work fine together. Just that I see no value in configuring them at the same time time on the same routers. Cisco da Gama http://ciscostudy.blogspot.com | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on February 12, 2006, 4:45 pm
Please log in for more thread options On 11 Feb 2006 08:25:25 -0800, ciscodagama@gmail.com wrote:
well I want to use GLBP load balancing features, but only for certain hosts, not all network. So I guess I could use HSRP for parts of network where I do not need LB or cannot/do not want rely on routing LB, but for some other parts of network I could use GLBP LB possibilities. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by ciscodagama@gmail.com on February 13, 2006, 5:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options > well I want to use GLBP load balancing features, but only for certain
> hosts, not all network. So I guess I could use HSRP for parts of network > where I do not need LB or cannot/do not want rely on routing LB, but for > some other parts of network I could use GLBP LB possibilities. OK. Though I could not see why HSRP and GLBP would not work correctly if configured simultaneously on the same interface, I decided to do a quick test on my lab routers. I found that it does work fine and so you should be fine to run the two together. I had some basic config like the following for the test - interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.169.0.3 255.255.255.0 no keepalive standby 2 ip 192.169.0.254 standby 2 priority 150 standby 2 preempt glbp 10 ip 192.169.0.253 Everything worked fine before and after a switchover. Cisco da Gama http://ciscostudy.blogspot.com | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Drx on February 14, 2006, 7:25 am
Please log in for more thread options On 13 Feb 2006 14:27:42 -0800, ciscodagama@gmail.com wrote:
>> well I want to use GLBP load balancing features, but only for certain
>> hosts, not all network. So I guess I could use HSRP for parts of network >> where I do not need LB or cannot/do not want rely on routing LB, but for >> some other parts of network I could use GLBP LB possibilities. >
> OK. > > Though I could not see why HSRP and GLBP would not work > correctly if configured simultaneously on the same interface, I > decided to do a quick test on my lab routers. I found that it does > work fine and so you should be fine to run the two together. > > I had some basic config like the following for the test - > > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 192.169.0.3 255.255.255.0 > no keepalive > standby 2 ip 192.169.0.254 > standby 2 priority 150 > standby 2 preempt > glbp 10 ip 192.169.0.253 > > Everything worked fine before and after a switchover. > > Cisco da Gama > http://ciscostudy.blogspot.com ok, thanks for effort :-)))))))))))) btw you have GREAT alias, ciscodagama :-)))))) LOL | |||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| HSRP and GLBP | February 9, 2006, 2:56 am |
| OSPF with HSRP or GLBP | June 7, 2007, 4:10 am |
| glbp and ip nat | October 19, 2006, 7:37 am |
| GLBP for our WAN HA solution | August 14, 2007, 5:50 am |
| GLBP traffic filtering | May 18, 2006, 5:10 pm |
| GLBP EIGRP Scenario | April 23, 2008, 12:14 pm |
| How is "pri" calculated automatically by GLBP ? | July 1, 2008, 1:23 am |
| spanning-tree gateway load balancing (STP & GLBP) | March 12, 2007, 9:46 pm |
| HSRP with DSL and T1 | May 30, 2006, 2:29 pm |
| hsrp | February 26, 2008, 10:27 pm |
| IP SLA and HSRP - Please help | April 29, 2008, 11:23 am |
| HSRP Scenario | July 19, 2005, 6:32 am |
| HSRP with secondarys? | October 19, 2005, 9:16 am |
| Brief HSRP question | January 27, 2006, 9:10 am |
| HSRP on Catalyst | February 27, 2006, 6:51 am |
> have similar functionality, it is not clear when configuring both would
> be useful. Also, for hosts on the LAN where you have this pair of
> routers, what you configure as the default gateway? Will it be the
> HSRP virtual IP address or will it be the GLBP virtual IP address?
>
> Having said that, I think if you configured GLBP and HSRP together,
> it would probably work fine together. Just that I see no value in
> configuring them at the same time time on the same routers.
>
> Cisco da Gama
> http://ciscostudy.blogspot.com