GLBP for our WAN HA solution
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on August 14, 2007, 5:50 am
Please log in for more thread options I have a network infrastructure which has the central office and three remote offices, they are linked together by site-to-site VPNs ( set up with Cisco PIX ). we are going to set up the WAN HA solution in central office which will use three internet lines from three different ISPs. Shall we purchase three Cisco Routers ( for ISP lines ) in Central office to build up a GLBP network : 1. each remote office will set up three site-to-site VPNs ( each for each ISP ) linking to central office to form the failover/load-sharing 2. in central office, a PIX failover system behind the routers; the PIx failover system is the same subnet with LAN I would like to know if the above infrastructure is practical ? does the above system achieve the bandwidth sharing and failover for WAN ? Thank you so much for your input | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by J.Cottingim on August 15, 2007, 1:16 am
Please log in for more thread options Benson, I'm going to assume you are not only going to be using eBGP, but iBGP as well. I don't believe it would be a good idea to set up 3 separate VPN's per site. - one would probably be sufficient. If you set up more than one to each location, you'd have to set up some pretty tricky routing to make it work. I would suggest setting up two PIX's at the home office for HA. This would allow for an easier configuration and routing. Just a thought, why three ISP's - two is usually enough. Good Luck JC | ||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| GLBP for our WAN HA solution | August 14, 2007, 5:50 am |
| glbp and ip nat | October 19, 2006, 7:37 am |
| HSRP and GLBP | February 9, 2006, 2:56 am |
| GLBP traffic filtering | May 18, 2006, 5:10 pm |
| OSPF with HSRP or GLBP | June 7, 2007, 4:10 am |
| GLBP EIGRP Scenario | April 23, 2008, 12:14 pm |
| How is "pri" calculated automatically by GLBP ? | July 1, 2008, 1:23 am |
| spanning-tree gateway load balancing (STP & GLBP) | March 12, 2007, 9:46 pm |
| Can someone check this NAT/ACL solution please? | December 22, 2005, 2:57 pm |
| Failover solution with two ISP on 871 | January 20, 2007, 9:43 am |
| solution for load sharing ? | August 17, 2005, 12:03 pm |
| Configuring a failover solution | November 29, 2005, 8:00 pm |
| Need a VPN solution for 25 users..already own PIX 515UR | September 26, 2006, 10:14 am |
| Cisco security solution | October 12, 2006, 8:34 am |
| Advanced VPN Solution Help (ASA 5500) | August 30, 2007, 11:17 am |
>
> I have a network infrastructure which has the central office and three
> remote offices, they are linked together by site-to-site VPNs ( set up
> with Cisco PIX ).
>
> we are going to set up the WAN HA solution in central office which
> will use three internet lines from three different ISPs.
>
> Shall we purchase three Cisco Routers ( for ISP lines ) in Central
> office to build up a GLBP network :
> 1. each remote office will set up three site-to-site VPNs ( each for
> each ISP ) linking to central
> office to form the failover/load-sharing
> 2. in central office, a PIX failover system behind the routers; the
> PIx failover system is the same
> subnet with LAN
>
> I would like to know if the above infrastructure is practical ? does
> the above system achieve the bandwidth sharing and failover for WAN ?
>
> Thank you so much for your input