|
|
|
Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||
|
Posted by Mikey on May 11, 2006, 4:42 pm
Please log in for more thread options
interleaving of packets. According to Cisco documentation, if frame-relay traffic shaping is enabled when using fragmentation, even when LLQ is used for providing the priority queue, interleaving will not occur. Is that the case? Also, when using FRF.12, the sample configs in the Cisco docs show the fragmentation configured on the interface. Could the fragmentation be configured in the map-class, along with the application of the LLQ policy-map, and still get the same results? Thanks in advance, Mikey | ||||||||||
|
Posted by thrill5 on May 12, 2006, 12:17 am
Please log in for more thread options your port speed is less than 128k, there is no need to implement interleaving or fragmentation. Scott | ||||||||||
|
Posted by Mikey on May 12, 2006, 12:49 am
Please log in for more thread options This is an academic question.........
| ||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Frame Relay fragmentation and interleaving | May 11, 2006, 4:42 pm |
| Need Info abt Frame relay fragmentation header | September 4, 2006, 2:27 am |
| Frame-Relay and PPP Help | April 13, 2006, 5:02 pm |
| Frame Relay>>>>>Do we need a CSU/DSU? | March 27, 2007, 5:03 pm |
| Frame Relay Router | February 7, 2005, 2:18 pm |
| Frame-relay map and inverse-arp | February 10, 2005, 5:33 pm |
| Frame Relay Capture? | August 4, 2005, 2:03 pm |
| debug frame-relay lmi | October 25, 2005, 1:42 am |
| The use of HDLC in Frame relay? | February 3, 2007, 1:51 am |
| Frame Relay and DLCI | August 25, 2006, 12:06 am |
| Frame Relay Question | September 5, 2006, 4:37 pm |
| Frame relay configuration | September 10, 2006, 8:54 am |
| Multilink Frame-Relay | September 18, 2006, 4:43 pm |
| Help on BGP on Frame-relay network | October 8, 2006, 5:39 am |
| Little help with frame relay upgrade | December 27, 2006, 3:34 pm |

Frame Relay fragmentation and interleaving
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 






> interleaving of packets. According to Cisco documentation, if
> frame-relay traffic shaping is enabled when using fragmentation, even
> when LLQ is used for providing the priority queue, interleaving will
> not occur. Is that the case? Also, when using FRF.12, the sample
> configs in the Cisco docs show the fragmentation configured on the
> interface. Could the fragmentation be configured in the map-class,
> along with the application of the LLQ policy-map, and still get the
> same results?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Mikey
>