Cisco for load balancing w/o BGP
|
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Yoann Roman on October 11, 2006, 12:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options
outbound load balancing over several links w/o using BGP. Basically, Cisco's equivalent to: - Linksys RV082: http://tinyurl.com/myauh - SonicWall PRO 3060: http://www.sonicwall.com/products/pro3060.html - And the like... I figure that, since a Cisco-based Linksys device offers this, there must be a more enterprise Cisco product offering it, too, but the Cisco reps I've talked to haven't been very helpful. Thanks, -- Yoann Roman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Barry Margolin on October 11, 2006, 11:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options  of them. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Yoann Roman on October 30, 2006, 10:53 am
Please log in for more thread options That's not what the Cisco SE's have been telling me. They're suggesting using CEF on top of multiple default routes to get any type of load balancing. It's apparently not as robust as other solutions by SonicWall / FatPipe/ F5, but it seems to be Cisco's answer right now. Anyone ever used CEF? -- Yoann Roman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Barry Margolin on October 30, 2006, 9:53 pm
Please log in for more thread options You need to use CEF if you want per-packet load balancing without excess overhead. If you don't enable CEF, the default is per-destination load balancing, unless you turn off the route-cache, but that can have serious performance impact. -- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Yoann Roman on October 31, 2006, 9:51 am
Please log in for more thread options What about getting per connection load balancing (with TCP, not UDP obviously)? That's the approach I've seem implemented on alternative products. Based on what the Cisco SE said, CIOS only has per destination or per packet load balancing, but no round robin per connection load balancing. Thanks. -- Yoann Roman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Cisco for load balancing w/o BGP | October 11, 2006, 12:14 pm |
| Load Balancing / Load Sharing over parallel paths | November 21, 2005, 9:14 am |
| server load balancing using a cisco | July 14, 2005, 9:34 am |
| configure cisco load balancing with daul isp | May 20, 2007, 6:46 am |
| Load Balancing | February 15, 2005, 6:13 pm |
| load-balancing t1s | August 30, 2005, 2:54 pm |
| Load Balancing | February 20, 2006, 11:33 am |
| OER and load balancing | March 2, 2006, 10:06 am |
| load balancing | January 3, 2007, 8:35 pm |
| load-balancing t1s | February 16, 2007, 1:43 pm |
| To QoS or load-balancing or both | July 21, 2008, 5:35 pm |
| Load Balancing NxSTM1s | August 23, 2005, 10:36 pm |
| RV042 and pix with load balancing | October 12, 2005, 9:01 am |
| Load Balancing 2 Routes | October 17, 2005, 8:08 am |
| Re: BGP and load balancing two routers | October 17, 2005, 10:48 am |
|
Home Cabling Guide
Finally, an instantly downloadable book that saves you thousands in home improvement dollars! Enjoy living in 21st century technology-advanced home while increasing its selling value and competitive advantage on the real estate market. Whether your cabling is for home office or high-tech leisure, you can wire your home yourself or learn "wirish" to speak with your cabling contractors in their language! Click Here to learn more |
> outbound load balancing over several links w/o using BGP.