Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by SPAMMERSAREMORONS on December 3, 2005, 2:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options BGP-based T1's (roughly 4.5Mbps). I'm only seeing 44KB/sec uploads and 100KB/sec downloads night and day. I was curious what other people had found. Thanks | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by CiscoHeadsetAdapter.com on December 3, 2005, 9:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options connected directly to your router (for example, T1 between two offices), then you could get about 140-150Kbytes/sec (1.5MBit divided by 8 Bits, minus 10-20% administrative overhead (TCP/IP headers, etc.) If you are talking about Internet download/upload, then it could be anything from 0.0001 Bytes/sec to 150Kbytes per second, since you are going through shared media. For example, you are downloading something out of the web. That company has one T1, and if you are alone, who downloads at this time, then you could get 150KBytes/sec. But if there are 10 people, who download at this particular time, then everybody gets 15KBytes/second, and so on. Good luck, Mike www.ciscoheadsetadapter.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by on December 5, 2005, 5:58 am
Please log in for more thread options > I was curious what FTP speeds we should expect with a single T1 or the
> BGP-based T1's (roughly 4.5Mbps). I'm only seeing 44KB/sec uploads and > 0KB/sec downloads night and day. I was curious what other people had > found. Thanks There are many issues here. Some sites limit the bandwidth per user. What is the round trip time between the sites? What are the TCP window sizes. What is the error rate on the link. I am on a 100Mbps Internet link and I see 400K Bytes/sec download from for example Cisco. i.e. 4Mbps. This does not surprise me at all. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by SPAMMERSAREMORONS on December 5, 2005, 9:19 am
Please log in for more thread options Intead of one T1 we have three using BGP. Based on that, I've see 450KB/sec
on web-based downloads that jive with the formula: 4632 / 8 = 579.00 - 115.80 (20%) = 463.20. 4632 * 8 = 3 T1's at 1.544Mbps. The twist here is that FTP speeds can do no better than 44Kbps (Uploads) and 104Kbps (Downloads) night or day. They can even plummet to 4Kbps during busy periods (which I can understand). It just seems that either FTP speeds are capped with our BGP setup. >> I was curious what FTP speeds we should expect with a single T1 or the
>> BGP-based T1's (roughly 4.5Mbps). I'm only seeing 44KB/sec uploads and >> 0KB/sec downloads night and day. I was curious what other people had >> found. Thanks >
> There are many issues here. > > Some sites limit the bandwidth per user. > What is the round trip time between the sites? > What are the TCP window sizes. > What is the error rate on the link. > > I am on a 100Mbps Internet link and I see 400K Bytes/sec > download from for example Cisco. i.e. 4Mbps. > > This does not surprise me at all. > | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Hansang Bae on December 6, 2005, 1:26 am
Please log in for more thread options SPAMMERSAREMORONS wrote:
> Intead of one T1 we have three using BGP. Based on that, I've see
> 450KB/sec on web-based downloads that jive with the formula: 4632 / 8 > = 579.00 - 115.80 (20%) = 463.20. 4632 * 8 = 3 T1's at 1.544Mbps. > > The twist here is that FTP speeds can do no better than 44Kbps > (Uploads) and 104Kbps (Downloads) night or day. They can even plummet > to 4Kbps during busy periods (which I can understand). It just seems > that either FTP speeds are capped with our BGP setup. BGP has nothing whatever to do with your setup. What matters is whether you are mux'ing the circuits or not (hardware IMUX or MLPPP). Based on the fact that you are getting ~4Mbps thoughput, it looks like you are mux'ing them together (or per packet load balancing) As to your ftp issue, it's entirely possible that someone is rate-limiting your ftp jobs or your ftp client is horribly inefficient. Remember that tcp typically needs a window size == 2* BW*DELAY to fill the pipes. -- hsb "Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding" Calvin **************************ROT13 MY ADDRESS************************* Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not be able to reply to emails sent to my account. Please post a followup instead. ******************************************************************** | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Cisco 2600 Series Router T1 Speeds | December 3, 2005, 2:26 pm |
| Upgrading a Cisco 2600 Series Router | November 15, 2006, 1:27 pm |
| 2600 series router using SDM | July 19, 2008, 6:14 am |
| HWIC-AP for 2600 Series | December 18, 2005, 4:50 am |
| NetFlow on a 2600 series | September 25, 2006, 11:27 am |
| PWR-2600-AC 2600 power supply to switch over a DC router? | August 7, 2008, 9:16 pm |
| Cisco 2600 Router | September 30, 2005, 12:09 am |
| A non-Cisco router, BDCOM 1700 Router Series | June 28, 2008, 4:27 am |
| QoS/ToS Support in Cisco 2600 Router | November 29, 2005, 6:37 am |
| QoS/ToS Support in Cisco 2600 Router | November 29, 2005, 6:38 am |
| Cisco 2600 Router VOIP | November 21, 2006, 10:39 pm |
| Disabling IPX on Cisco 2600 Router | February 9, 2007, 2:04 pm |
| power over ethernet, cisco 2600 router | November 23, 2008, 3:02 pm |
| my cisco 831 is giving limiting my upload speeds significantly... please help | January 8, 2007, 1:52 am |
| Cisco 7200 Series Router Question | April 23, 2006, 10:18 am |

Cisco 2600 Series Router T1 Speeds
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 





>BGP-based T1's (roughly 4.5Mbps). I'm only seeing 44KB/sec uploads and
>100KB/sec downloads night and day. I was curious what other people had
>found. Thanks
>