Cat OS VLAN question
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Trouble on July 7, 2006, 6:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options I try and remove it removes both ports. Anyway around this ?? is this a bug??? what is going on... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Walter Roberson on July 7, 2006, 6:33 pm
Please log in for more thread options Are ports 3/9 and 3/10 somehow bridged together? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Trouble on July 7, 2006, 6:39 pm
Please log in for more thread options Man it's strange how can I tell if they are bridge together??
Walter Roberson wrote: > >set vlan 100 3/9 when I do this is add port 3/10 to vlan 100 also. When
> >I try and remove it removes both ports. Anyway around this ?? is this a > >bug??? what is going on... >
> Are ports 3/9 and 3/10 somehow bridged together? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Arnold Nipper on July 7, 2006, 6:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options On 08.07.2006 00:33 Walter Roberson wrote
>>set vlan 100 3/9 when I do this is add port 3/10 to vlan 100 also. When
>>I try and remove it removes both ports. Anyway around this ?? is this a >>bug??? what is going on... >
> Are ports 3/9 and 3/10 somehow bridged together? > Even if ports are channeled ( I guess that's what you mean by "bridged") setting one port to another vlan does not affect the other -- Arnold Nipper, AN45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Trouble on July 7, 2006, 7:06 pm
Please log in for more thread options Still not working and I can't understand why this is happening.
Arnold Nipper wrote: > On 08.07.2006 00:33 Walter Roberson wrote
> > >>set vlan 100 3/9 when I do this is add port 3/10 to vlan 100 also. When
> >>I try and remove it removes both ports. Anyway around this ?? is this a > >>bug??? what is going on... > >
> > Are ports 3/9 and 3/10 somehow bridged together? > > >
> Even if ports are channeled ( I guess that's what you mean by "bridged") > setting one port to another vlan does not affect the other > > -- > Arnold Nipper, AN45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Vlan and PIX question | March 28, 2006, 11:16 am |
| Cat OS VLAN question | July 7, 2006, 6:32 pm |
| VLAN Question | March 8, 2007, 3:06 pm |
| VLAN Question | July 25, 2007, 12:41 pm |
| VLAN Question | August 22, 2007, 3:01 pm |
| vlan and vpn config question | January 12, 2006, 10:04 am |
| basic vlan pix 6.3 question | July 25, 2006, 2:26 am |
| Basic VLAN question. | June 27, 2005, 12:21 pm |
| Native VLAN question | November 22, 2005, 5:58 am |
| newbie's question on VLAN | September 15, 2006, 12:40 pm |
| VLAN IP Addressing Question | November 14, 2006, 10:32 am |
| question of vlan cisco | March 3, 2007, 12:36 am |
| VLAN basic question | March 2, 2007, 10:40 am |
| dot1q vlan question | March 21, 2007, 10:18 pm |
| native vlan question | April 15, 2008, 3:51 am |
>I try and remove it removes both ports. Anyway around this ?? is this a
>bug??? what is going on...