|
|
|
Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by JF Mezei on June 13, 2007, 3:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
If I were to get a 3525 XL -EN switch, is this just a more recent version of the 2924 with , I assume, a faster processor ? ( the 3500 went out of sale in 2003 a couple years after 2900 series) Are there features I would lose by going from 2900 to 3500 series switch? Would I be able to just drop my config.text file into the 3500 and be up and running ? | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Doug McIntyre on June 13, 2007, 7:34 pm
Please log in for more thread options >Due to lightning, I am looking at a replacement for a 2924 XL-EN switch.
>If I were to get a 3525 XL -EN switch, is this just a more recent
>version of the 2924 with , I assume, a faster processor ? ( the 3500 >went out of sale in 2003 a couple years after 2900 series) Hmm, I seem to remember the 3524XL being out about the same time the 2924XL was out. Although the 2924 (non XL) was out earlier.. You won't get a faster processor. The only difference between the two? The 3524 has two GBIC slots on it. Otherwise, its identical. >Are there features I would lose by going from 2900 to 3500 series switch?
No, its the same. >Would I be able to just drop my config.text file into the 3500 and be up
>and running ? Sure, and your vlan.dat file too if you have any VLANs setup. Otherwise, if you don't have that file backed up, you'll have to do all that by hand again, or suck it down via VTP. Thanks cisco for making that alot better in later switch hardware. You'll gain GigabitEthernet 0/1 and GigabitEthernet 0/2 ports for your config, but everything else will be identical, assuming you load simular enough versions of IOS on it. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by JF Mezei on June 13, 2007, 7:53 pm
Please log in for more thread options Doug McIntyre wrote:
> You won't get a faster processor. The only difference between the two?
> The 3524 has two GBIC slots on it. Otherwise, its identical. Thanks for your quick reply. | ||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| 2900 XL-EN vs 3500 XL-EN | June 13, 2007, 3:31 pm |
| 2900 XL switch | February 8, 2005, 8:47 am |
| 3500 XL switch | October 11, 2006, 10:45 pm |
| IOS 3500 switch | December 10, 2006, 12:05 pm |
| catalyst 2900 xl | July 18, 2008, 7:35 am |
| Differences between 2950 adn 2900 | February 8, 2005, 4:05 pm |
| SNMPv3 with Catalyst 3500 XL | August 30, 2005, 12:31 pm |
| cisco 2900 vlans | May 27, 2006, 3:56 pm |
| 802.1q debugging on Catalyst 3500. | August 2, 2006, 9:04 am |
| The 1900 and 2900 switches | August 29, 2006, 11:49 pm |
| 3500-XL Requirements for PVLAN | October 4, 2006, 4:48 am |
| Re: cisco 3500 series XL | April 12, 2007, 6:31 am |
| Updating 2900 switch | September 26, 2007, 9:32 pm |
| Cisco Catalyst 2900 | February 28, 2008, 12:47 pm |
| Runts between Catalyst 2950 and 3500? | August 31, 2005, 1:18 pm |

2900 XL-EN vs 3500 XL-EN
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 





