Loopback interface and OSPF

Have a question or want to start a discussion? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View


Is there any other reason to configure a loopback address for OSPF other
than changing the Routers ID?
Such as, ensures that  an interface is always active for OSPF?




Re: Loopback interface and OSPF


Is this loopback address also called the logical address, and the
Router ID should be the highest logical address?



Re: Loopback interface and OSPF


be carefull with that statement.

you may actually get hit with a question such as this on the ccna test.

The RID will NOT ... I repeat *NOT* be the one with the highest logical
interface.

Remember, loopbacks are not the only logical interfaces on a router.
There are also subinterfaces.

To be completely accurate, you should make the statement ...

"The RID will be the highest physical interface on the router ...
unless a loopback interface has been configured. If a loop is
configured, the RID will be the highest loop address."

Gotta be carefull with wording ... Cisco is very good at tripping you
up on semantics.



Re: Loopback interface and OSPF


as far as i have studdied loopbacks are logical interfaces and are
used to manage the priority of the routers in one area. so basicly
you can set them manualy to the highest IP address in one area making
that router the DR, also they never go down (unless the router is
physicly turned off), so they solve problems with flapping
connections, please correct me if im wrong, thanks allot



Re: Loopback interface and OSPF



Quoted text here. Click to load it

also...
if you dont use RIDs you will find troubleshooting OSPF can be nasty.  I
tend to use low numbers for all routers except the DR/BDR.  This makes the
"sh ip ospf nei" command a lot easier to read/understand.

also...
ospf virtual-links require RID information when being configured.

SysAdm




Site Timeline