Cisco job UK

Have a question or want to start a discussion? Post it! No Registration Necessary.  Now with pictures!

Threaded View
Hi Guys,

I have CCNA, Beng in telecoms and four years in telecom installations,
mainly cabling. I am fourty and badly need to do something now before
it  is
to late, i mean a couple of more years and accordingly to some people
they will right me off becouse there are a lot's of young gays out
there with the same certs. What should I do? If you now of any good
agencies or cold colling techniques. Please show me the light? Should I
do CCNP ?


Re: Cisco job UK
Quoted text here. Click to load it

In which case, hit them with an anti-discrimination suit. Its illegal
to employ people on the basis of age or sexual orientation. :)

CCNA is an entry level cert. On its own, its not worth very much. You
could move on to CCNP as one route, then look at CCDA/DP as a bit of a
differentiator. However, no cert (even the covetted CCIE) is a
sure-fire way to career joy.

The only possible exception is that CISSP is going to be sort after for
the next couple of years, but without any demostratable IT security
experience, it may take you a bit longer to land that one.

Matt


Re: Cisco job UK
yamahasw40 wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it

The CISSP? That cert's a joke! I knew a guy who had no real security
experience, studied a book for three months or so, and passed. That
cert's little more than paper cert.

Re: Cisco job UK
I agree.

In most case, Certifications don't actually test the skills of the
candidate.
So people who knew the just the questions and answers and memorize it
should pass quite smoothly.

In my opinion, I always test the skills and knowledge of everyone
before I hire.


Re: Cisco job UK
slim wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it

That a lot of companies care about these days.  Joke or not, it it
helps one get a job, I say "why not?"

--

hsb


"Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding" Calvin
**************************ROT13 MY ADDRESS*************************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account. Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************

Re: Cisco job UK
Hansang Bae wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Don't you think that is a *very* dangerous approach, especially when it
comes to issues of infosec? It would seem that having a sense of
"uneasiness" or comprehending a lack of knowledge is much better than
being lulled into a false sense of security proficiency. I'd think those
who believe they are knowledgeable when in fact they're potentially
incompetent are the ones that will take a company down or cause it to
make the headlines!

Re: Cisco job UK
Its like a drivers license. You need one. It doesn't make you a master,
but if there are two people with equal experience, the paper cert could
break the deadlock.

The exact same argument can be levelled against CCNA, CCNP or any other
Cisco cert, with the exception of the CCIE (and none of this "CCIE
Written" bullshit). If you are rub

At least your mate studied the books for three months. He could have
spent three nights cramming the TestKing answers and got the paper cert
that way.

But that's not the point.

The point is that Security is the current Y2K, and for every job
requiring intimate knowledge of BGP 4+. there are a hundred requiring
security, and the ratio of practitioners is a lot less. COOs, CEOs and
quite a few CIOs don't know the difference between CISSP and CCIE
(Security), but do know that they have to employ somebody to secure
their network before the nasty hackers sell their confidential business
IP to their rivals.


Re: Cisco job UK
yamahasw40 wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it
You're missing my point, I think...

Just because I pass a cert exam doesn't mean I'm qualified. This
individual is being tasked with security direction for a company that
houses people's financial records. Would you want someone unqualified
with final authority in matters pertaining to the safety of your
financial info?

I think Cisco certs are a bit different. You have to demonstrate,
tangibly, your mastery of the material. I had more respect for the CISSP
than I do now, simply because you couldn't pull that stuff in a Cisco
cert context (study for a couple of months with little to no previous
experience), especially at the CCIE level.

Re: Cisco job UK
slim wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it

And you're missing mine.  

 
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Conversely, just because you have a cert, does not mean you are *not*
qualified.  Double negative for emphasis!


Quoted text here. Click to load it

Of course not.  But again, you're assuming the person with a cert is
incompetent and I'm saying that may not be the case.  We are actually
on the same sheet of music.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

They are not.

Quoted text here. Click to load it

No, not really.

Quoted text here. Click to load it


Sure you can.  With the explosion of CCIE training tailored to help you
pass the exams, this is no longer the case.  It hasn't been for quite
some time.

And before someone butts in with the usual non sequitur, I hold just
about every IT cert there is so I know of what I speak.  Not because I
needed them or even wanted them, but because it benefited my employers.
You see, one of the *real* reasons for cert is so that the company can
say "we have 110,000 CERTIFIED people to help you."  This makes buyers
feel warm and fuzzy about support.  Of course it doesn't follow what
certified == experienced, but companies didn't care.

Very few people know this, but Novell used to make people come to Provo
to take hands on tests.  This was late 80's as I recall.  Then the
market exploded, Paper CNE became a house hold name in the TI industry,
and MS followed suit.

I'll credit Cisco for trying to keep a check on it by mandating the
hands on tests.   But it too has been watered down.


--

hsb


"Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding" Calvin
**************************ROT13 MY ADDRESS*************************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account. Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************

Re: Cisco job UK
Hansang Bae wrote:

Quoted text here. Click to load it

OK...I'll bite! :-)

I'd really like to hear some more of your thoughts on your last
statement. Not that I've drank too much of the Cisco Kool-Aid, but
having invested a fair amount of my own money and time into Cisco certs
and being at a small crossroads in my networking career, I'd like to
know your observations on a couple of things:

First - your thoughts on the key ingredients to the successful future of
a network engineer (not a guy bucking for management, but someone who
loves and has passion for network tech as a whole), and...

Second - the importance of certifications relating to the above.

We have all heard ad-nausium the arguments, pro and con, for certs.
However, your charge that Cisco is becoming watered down is pretty bold,
considering the lengths their willing to go to in order to preserve the
marketability of the test. I understand the concept of certification
marketing, however, there's got to be more value than simply giving a
customer warm-fuzzies. I guess that if that's what it takes to make a
buck, then most business types would say the means justify the ends. I,
however, don't wish to spend limited time and funds on something that
has a historical context of failure. Other's claim education (more
degrees) are the key. Some claim all of the above. Some claim that a
network engineer should consider themselves a relic, go get an MBA, and
stop leaching off of society.

Make sense?

Re: Cisco job UK
slim wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it


I'm glad to hear that you've stayed away from the Kool-aid! :)

 
Quoted text here. Click to load it

Very simple.  Learn the technology inside and out.  Learn it to learn
it.  Not to pass a test.  For example, you don't have to read "Inside
Cisco IOS Software Architecture" to pass any Cisco exams.  But it's a
good book to read because it goes into the depths of some obscure
topics (although it's -the book is- showing its age).  Alex Zinin's
book is another good example.  Here's the difference between an
engineer and a tech.  It boils down to one more layer of abstraction.
A tech will know that that a default gateway is always represented as
0.0.0.0 with a netmask of 0.0.0.0.  An engineer will know exactly why
it's referenced that way.  A tech will know how to read "sho ip ospf
neigh"  An engineer will know how to use the OSPF database to
troubleshoot a problem.  Or what problems may lead to what issues
during the OSPF process (of coming up/forming an adjacency).  Know so
much that you become the "GOTO guy" in your office.  A tech may keep
typing commands until it works and then will walk away (knob turning)
but an engineer will go directly to the (most likely) source of the
problem.



Quoted text here. Click to load it

google my posts on this topic.  I haven't wavered.  Experience is good.
Experience with certification is almost always better.  When you build
up a relationship, no one will care that you have XYZ cert.  But having
that XYZ cert may land you one more client so why not?  Of course, if
your business is booming, it becomes a matter of diminishing returns.
You're already overbooked with clients so why bother?



Quoted text here. Click to load it

When they removed some key aspects of CCIE exam, I knew they were on
the decline.  When they don't think about using relative scoring to
pass candidates, they don't care about certifying top notch people.  By
that I mean, pass the top X percent of the people who took the exam
that month.  We already do that for admission to college do we not?  Or
do what PEs and CPAs do.  Even after you pass the exam, you have to be
sponsored for one/two years.


Quoted text here. Click to load it

You forgot to expand on that sentence.  Giving customers warm and
fuzzies so the resellers can make money.


Quoted text here. Click to load it


A good degree is more important than any cert.  A degree with certs is
better.  A degree with certs and experience can be the differentiator.
It sure sounds like you're on the right track though.  Reading your
posts, it sounds like you know what you want.

--

hsb


"Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding" Calvin
**************************ROT13 MY ADDRESS*************************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account. Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************

Re: Cisco job UK
[snip: cissp cert]
Quoted text here. Click to load it


slim wrote:
Quoted text here. Click to load it



You're assuming the person is incompetent.  I'm arguing that if you
know your stuff, get the stupid cert to help you land a job.  Almost
all certifications are stupid by design.  Certs try to boil down what
the company and resellers think is important and will dish it up in an
exam.  No certification - non military ones anyway :) - is immune from
this.


--

hsb


"Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding" Calvin
**************************ROT13 MY ADDRESS*************************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account. Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************

Site Timeline