Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted by danejasho on December 15, 2006, 11:11 am
Please log in for more thread options cords like this one: http://cableorganizer.com/retractable/ This seems like a bad idea as it defeats the necessary twists in a Cat5 cable. Does anyone have any resource they can point to that discusses this or speak to it directly? Thank you! | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by James on December 15, 2006, 12:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options twists, so, that means crosstalk - conversations/voltages/spikes on wires that are adjacent to other. The twists keep this talk to each dedicated pair, and any noise generated is cancelled out the other end. Regards danejasho wrote: | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by Steve Ray on December 15, 2006, 2:55 pm
Please log in for more thread options I'd be very surprised if these issues were not realised and designed out at
the manufacturing process by the tech teams involved with this what surprises me more is the cost, its hellish and all you are getting is a spring loaded coil with a plastic outer. Give me a 3m piece of UTP anyday Steve > Yes this does look like a bad idea, it's a flat cable, so therefore no
> twists, so, that means crosstalk - conversations/voltages/spikes on wires > that are adjacent to other. The twists keep this talk to each dedicated > pair, and any noise generated is cancelled out the other end. > > Regards > > > danejasho wrote: >> I see a lot of people in my organization using retractable ethernet
>> cords like this one: >> >> http://cableorganizer.com/retractable/ >> >> This seems like a bad idea as it defeats the necessary twists in a Cat5 >> cable. Does anyone have any resource they can point to that discusses >> this or speak to it directly? >> >> Thank you! >> | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by danejasho on December 15, 2006, 3:49 pm
Please log in for more thread options Steve Ray wrote:
> I'd be very surprised if these issues were not realised and designed out at
> the manufacturing process by the tech teams involved with this > > what surprises me more is the cost, its hellish and all you are getting is a > spring loaded coil with a plastic outer. Give me a 3m piece of UTP anyday > > Steve That's what I thought, but there is no IEEE rating on the retractable cable (at least it's not on the web site), but if you search the same site for a standard 1000' box of Cat5E cable, they have all the IEEE and EIA/TIA standards clearly identified. Perhaps it works 'good enough' since the length appears to be limited to a few meters. | |||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Retractable ethernet travel cables | December 15, 2006, 11:11 am |
| ISDN Cables | May 3, 2007, 10:07 pm |
| AAUI to Ethernet tranceivers vs. AUI to Ethernet tranceivers | March 11, 2005, 10:37 pm |
| Newbie question re back-to-back serial cables | October 17, 2007, 1:33 pm |
| back-to-back cisco serial cables | March 6, 2005, 11:29 pm |
| help about ethernet limits | February 21, 2006, 12:26 pm |
| Best Power Over Ethernet Explanation! | May 9, 2005, 11:00 pm |
| Re: DHCP on ethernet question | February 8, 2006, 7:50 pm |
| telnet to 2509 across ethernet | August 28, 2006, 3:25 pm |
| Ethernet addapter for 2503 Router | September 24, 2005, 9:32 pm |
| multiple ethernet router choice | September 11, 2006, 10:36 am |
| Min 64 bytes in data payload for Ethernet frame?!? | March 16, 2005, 10:07 am |
| question about mixing serial and ethernet on test | March 21, 2005, 12:12 pm |
| Ethernet frame size - incosistency in books | April 24, 2005, 9:54 pm |
| Difference between GBIC and Giga Ethernet interface | August 9, 2006, 3:28 am |

Retractable ethernet travel cables
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 





> cords like this one:
>
> http://cableorganizer.com/retractable/
>
> This seems like a bad idea as it defeats the necessary twists in a Cat5
> cable. Does anyone have any resource they can point to that discusses
> this or speak to it directly?
>
> Thank you!
>