Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Radrage on July 25, 2008, 2:00 am
Please log in for more thread options Anyone with some Cisco certification experience knows that the exams are adaptive in nature. If you miss a question on subjet X, the test engine weighs questions on that subject heavier in its test pool and you will receive more questions on that subject. After recently sitting several certification exams, I would suggest that this is also true for not only questions you miss, but questions you spend more time on than others. I sat an exam yesterday and noticed that after pondering for a very long time on a simple single answer multiple choice question, I started receiving more and more questions on that subject.... which in the grand scheme of test subjects is a relatively very very small and nearly insignificant subject (whether port security is allowed on voice vlans). Anyway, I thought I'd pass this insight on. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Intuitive on August 4, 2008, 3:39 am
Please log in for more thread options Apparently this type of adaptive test is not being used, but I can also vouch that it IS definitely used! The more questions you get wrong on a subject; the more questions you get on it. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by John Agosta on August 4, 2008, 10:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options Total Bunk.
None of these exams are "adatpive" in nature. >
> > Anyone with some Cisco certification experience knows that the exams are > adaptive in nature. If you miss a question on subjet X, the test engine > weighs questions on that subject heavier in its test pool and you will > receive more questions on that subject. > > After recently sitting several certification exams, I would suggest that > this is also true for not only questions you miss, but questions you spend > more time on than others. I sat an exam yesterday and noticed that after > pondering for a very long time on a simple single answer multiple choice > question, I started receiving more and more questions on that subject.... > which in the grand scheme of test subjects is a relatively very very small > and nearly insignificant subject (whether port security is allowed on > voice vlans). > > Anyway, I thought I'd pass this insight on. > | |||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Exam Advice | July 25, 2008, 2:00 am |
| Any advice on the CSVPN exam? | January 8, 2006, 1:54 pm |
| CCSP IPS exam advice? | January 30, 2006, 11:00 am |
| job advice | June 27, 2007, 1:43 pm |
| Some BCMSN Advice | May 7, 2005, 12:02 am |
| Certificate advice | May 11, 2005, 9:55 am |
| Question/Advice | June 1, 2006, 2:43 pm |
| need advice on passing the CIT | November 15, 2006, 7:08 pm |
| Advice about 642-523 SNPA | May 9, 2008, 1:57 pm |
| CCSP advice | May 18, 2008, 5:18 am |
| I need more advice from the pro's | June 19, 2008, 5:03 pm |
| Advice from all of you folks | September 13, 2008, 3:21 pm |
| CCDP ARCH 642-871 advice needed | March 27, 2007, 10:54 pm |
| Need advice about test and study guides | May 29, 2006, 2:36 am |
| show int ,protocols,route advice | June 14, 2006, 4:46 pm |

Exam Advice
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 



>
> Anyone with some Cisco certification experience knows that the exams are
> adaptive in nature. If you miss a question on subjet X, the test engine
> weighs questions on that subject heavier in its test pool and you will
> receive more questions on that subject.
>
> After recently sitting several certification exams, I would suggest that
> this is also true for not only questions you miss, but questions you
> spend more time on than others. I sat an exam yesterday and noticed
> that after pondering for a very long time on a simple single answer
> multiple choice question, I started receiving more and more questions on
> that subject.... which in the grand scheme of test subjects is a
> relatively very very small and nearly insignificant subject (whether
> port security is allowed on voice vlans).
>
> Anyway, I thought I'd pass this insight on.
>