Hi all,
How do I name in my project 400 hosts ? My network address is
192.168.24.0. Would it be like this:First IP - 192.168.24.1 Last IP - 192.168.25.254 Both Mask - 255.255.252.0
Am I correct ?
Hi all,
How do I name in my project 400 hosts ? My network address is
192.168.24.0. Would it be like this:First IP - 192.168.24.1 Last IP - 192.168.25.254 Both Mask - 255.255.252.0
Am I correct ?
Hi all,
How do I name in my project 400 hosts ? My network address is
192.168.24.0. Would it be like this:First IP - 192.168.24.1 Last IP - 192.168.25.254 Both Mask - 255.255.252.0
Am I correct ?
minimum mask would be 255.255.254.0 (510 useable addresses)
what you have would work, but you have allowed for 1022 addresses.
>Hi Stephen !
I am trying to simulate this environment but Packet Tracer 4.0 does not allow to set this mask for this IP !
stephen escreveu:
Try using a 172.16.x.x or a 10.x.x.x
then that is a bug since the mask is valid - try setting it on a real device such as a PC......
A 192.168 address will require at least a 24 bit mask.
unless you use "ip classless"
or just any (non cisco) box that doesnt default to rules which are more than
10 years out of date :)
Is this not some form of "simulator?" Perhaps the the 'sim' wants the operator to stay within another set of rules.....
You cannot say it is a "class c" without the associated mask. It may look like one, it my be generally accepted that addresses in that range would normally be a /24, but it is an unsafe assumption.
These days make sure you always write the mask with a network address.
P.
could be.
so - either it is a "cisco" simulator (or why use this group) - in which case ip classless is fairly key to understanding how a cisco handles IP once you get past the basics.
or it isnt - in which case there should be a set of rules somewhere to check....
FWIW i think it more likely it is broken rather than operating a different rule set.
thats true as far as it goes - but "class" based addressing hasnt been best practice for a long time - ever since internet address space allocations of "bunch of class C" (or set of /24) numbers became common.
shame that most intro IP texts still seem to introduce addressing using classes before they get to the simpler more flexible classless stuff.
I think we are saying the same thing.
Cabling-Design.com Forums website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.