Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Posted by on July 30, 2007, 7:35 am
Please log in for more thread options Hello, I wrote my own PCB design software, which outputs Gerber and raster. One thing that puzzles me, when I see some PCB's (made by others) where the surface mount IC's are at a 45 degrees angle vs the rest is, how do they define those IC pads in Gerber? It can't be done with a traditional rectangular aperture flash (code D03, the one normally used to make pads) as far as I know, because those are either horizontal or vertical, so those 45 degrees pads must be done as traces (Gerber code D01), right? Thank you! Mike | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by qrk on July 30, 2007, 1:06 pm
Please log in for more thread options On 30 Jul 2007 11:35:22 GMT, mike@ihatespammers.com wrote: The stuff coming out of Orcad Layout is done as a bunch of regular draws, not as a single aperture. | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by Geo on July 30, 2007, 1:41 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On 30 Jul 2007 11:35:22 GMT, mike@ihatespammers.com wrote: >I wrote my own PCB design software, which outputs Gerber and raster.
>One thing that puzzles me, when I see some PCB's (made by others) where >the surface mount IC's are at a 45 degrees angle vs the rest is, how do >they define those IC pads in Gerber? It can't be done with a traditional >rectangular aperture flash (code D03, the one normally used to make pads) >as far as I know, because those are either horizontal or vertical, so >those 45 degrees pads must be done as traces (Gerber code D01), right? Flash a Diamond (a square at 45 degrees) at each end then draw between them. Geo | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by DJ Delorie on July 31, 2007, 4:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options
In PCB, I draw them as polygon fills if they have square ends, or as traces if they have rounded ends. | |||||||||||||
|
Posted by Guillaume on July 31, 2007, 4:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options
mike@ihatespammers.com wrote: > Hello,
> I wrote my own PCB design software, which outputs Gerber and raster. > One thing that puzzles me, when I see some PCB's (made by others) where > the surface mount IC's are at a 45 degrees angle vs the rest is, how do > they define those IC pads in Gerber? Aperture macros. | |||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| Those 45 degrees pads.. how is it done in Gerber? | July 30, 2007, 7:35 am |
| flood over smt pads in PADS | March 13, 2008, 2:01 pm |
| Gerber Viewers | September 15, 2004, 12:38 pm |
| Gerber editor? | December 3, 2004, 2:53 am |
| gerber to .doc format | February 26, 2005, 3:22 am |
| convertor from GDS to gerber | June 7, 2006, 4:59 am |
| Gerber files | September 4, 2006, 3:22 pm |
| Conversion? Gerber to 3D (.sat, .dxf, etc) | December 11, 2006, 1:57 am |
| gerber question | February 21, 2008, 11:22 pm |
| Bitmap To Gerber Conversor | September 29, 2004, 3:18 am |
| placement data from gerber | November 1, 2004, 2:00 am |
| Gerber Printer Driver | March 16, 2006, 7:04 pm |
| gerber viewer for CADSTAR help | April 1, 2006, 2:58 am |
| Gerber to G-Code, Help needed. | October 21, 2006, 12:30 am |
| Gerber viewer/handler | April 8, 2008, 2:48 pm |

Those 45 degrees pads.. how is it done in Gerber?
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 



>Hello,
>I wrote my own PCB design software, which outputs Gerber and raster.
>One thing that puzzles me, when I see some PCB's (made by others) where
>the surface mount IC's are at a 45 degrees angle vs the rest is, how do
>they define those IC pads in Gerber? It can't be done with a traditional
>rectangular aperture flash (code D03, the one normally used to make pads)
>as far as I know, because those are either horizontal or vertical, so
>those 45 degrees pads must be done as traces (Gerber code D01), right?
>
>Thank you!
>Mike