Bookmark this page:
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Al Dykes on February 16, 2006, 11:08 am
Please log in for more thread options Can I insert a plain DSL filter at the house POE if the phones the filter is supposed to isolate from the DSL signal are daisychained along one cable? -- a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Robert Redelmeier on February 16, 2006, 1:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options Yes, although the phones may draw too much current for a single filter. You are better off with a purpose-made splitter. The daisy-chaining harms nothing downstream of the filter. -- Robert | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Al Dykes on February 16, 2006, 1:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>> Can I insert a plain DSL filter at the house POE if the
>> phones the filter is supposed to isolate from the DSL signal >> are daisychained along one cable? >
>Yes, although the phones may draw too much current for >a single filter. You are better off with a purpose-made splitter. can you give me a make/model or a URL for a POE DSL/POTS device? -- a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by DecaturTxCowboy on February 16, 2006, 2:50 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Robert Redelmeier wrote: > Yes, although the phones may draw too much current for
> a single filter. You are better off with a purpose-made splitter. Since the central office lines are current limited, I don't think you'd even come near burning out any filter. Much less having more than 2 or 3 phones off hook at the same time. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Robert Redelmeier on February 16, 2006, 4:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Robert Redelmeier wrote:
>> Yes, although the phones may draw too much current for
>> a single filter. You are better off with a purpose-made splitter. >
> Since the central office lines are current limited, I don't > think you'd even come near burning out any filter. Much less > having more than 2 or 3 phones off hook at the same time. I'd tend to agree, but I wouldn't be so sure about ringing current. There is nothing stopping those filters being made very cheaply, although I suspect there not much more than a simple low-pass filter. There may be a resistor on the thru leg that could fry. -- Robert | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| daisychain POTS phone wiring and DSL filters? | February 16, 2006, 11:08 am |
| How best to terminate GigE/phone runs in wiring closet? | June 27, 2007, 11:02 pm |
| CAT 3 with POTS drop? | January 13, 2005, 4:42 pm |
| 10base-T & POTS in same Cat-5 cable? | April 27, 2005, 7:16 pm |
| Cat 5 for phone and ethernet? | December 20, 2004, 9:57 pm |
| Cat 5 for phone and ethernet? | December 20, 2004, 9:56 pm |
| HPNA/phone-net for MDU? | March 23, 2006, 11:23 pm |
| phone and power lines in the same trench | July 12, 2004, 6:25 am |
| Phone + Network on 1 CAT5 cable? | January 18, 2007, 10:12 am |
| Free Mobile Phone Applications | March 17, 2008, 7:29 am |
| Home phone cabling -- Leviton alternatives | October 24, 2004, 6:23 pm |
| Cat5 phone wall plates with post | July 1, 2005, 11:40 am |
| Cat53 cable with Phone line plug built-in? | April 18, 2007, 11:29 am |
| Homemade cat5 cable using existing phone line fails. | March 11, 2006, 5:41 am |
| Wiring Manufactures | July 9, 2004, 2:19 pm |

daisychain POTS phone wiring and DSL filters?
Yahoo!
Windows Live
del.icio.us
digg
Netscape 








> phones the filter is supposed to isolate from the DSL signal
> are daisychained along one cable?