LAN and Telecom Cabling RJ45 splitter for Ethernet - possible ?

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
RJ45 splitter for Ethernet - possible ? P.Schuman 03-28-08
Posted by on March 29, 2008, 11:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:59:20 -0400, lawrence.jones@siemens.com wrote:

>Nonetheless, Cat5 has incredibly noise
>rejection. People who have tried to provoke errors from induced noise
>have found it quite difficult to do.
>
>-Larry Jones

That is my experience. I have been parroting the company line about
florecent ballasts and ringing current, simply because it is accepted
practice but I have never fixed a problem by moving a Cat5 away from
these things. You just do it so somebody else doesn't come along and
say "there is your problem", waste a lot of time and not fix anything
either.


Posted by DTC on March 29, 2008, 1:01 am
Please log in for more thread options
News Reader wrote:
> A telephone ringing signal is an 88v 20Hz A.C. signal superimposed on
> 48v nominal D.C. supervisory voltage.

True

> not appropriate for sharing a Cat 5e cable run with data.

False - We have several 200 foot runs of buried CAT5 that carry
100 Meg data, digital phone TDM, analog POTS lines, and T1.

Posted by on March 29, 2008, 6:01 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>
> We have several 200 foot runs of buried CAT5 that carry
> 100 Meg data, digital phone TDM, analog POTS lines, and T1.

Which is precisely *why* twisted-pair ethernet was designed to coexist
with those kinds of signals.

-Larry Jones

Monopoly is more fun when you make your own Chance cards. -- Calvin

Posted by on March 28, 2008, 7:51 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:47:40 -0400, lawrence.jones@siemens.com wrote:

>> Don't do this with POTS phones unless you can live with the errors
>> when the phone rings.
>
>Since 10Base-T and 100Base-TX were both designed to coexist with phone
>lines in the same cable, that shouldn't be a problem.


Maybe BICSI has changed their opinion but that was what I heard when I
was in school. I know it works but it is not recomended

Posted by News Reader on March 28, 2008, 7:09 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Might want to check your system clock.

Your last post came in about an hour early.

:>)

Best Regards,
News Reader

gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:47:40 -0400, lawrence.jones@siemens.com wrote:
>
>>> Don't do this with POTS phones unless you can live with the errors
>>> when the phone rings.
>> Since 10Base-T and 100Base-TX were both designed to coexist with phone
>> lines in the same cable, that shouldn't be a problem.
>
>
> Maybe BICSI has changed their opinion but that was what I heard when I
> was in school. I know it works but it is not recomended

Similar ThreadsPosted
RJ45 splitter for Ethernet - possible ? March 28, 2008, 11:56 am
Ethernet: which RJ45 pins? August 9, 2007, 9:49 am
best RJ45 crimper under $100? August 14, 2005, 3:27 pm
1 RJ45 to 4 BT converter? August 31, 2005, 3:18 pm
RJ45 connector question July 8, 2004, 2:55 pm
RJ45 to 110 Cross-Connects August 24, 2004, 1:13 am
DB25-to-RJ45 Adapters December 17, 2005, 8:04 pm
RJ45 connectors with a larger "gate"? September 22, 2004, 10:22 pm
RJ45 connectors with a larger "gate"? September 23, 2004, 9:59 pm
Corrosion in RJ11 / RJ45 Connectors April 14, 2005, 5:51 am
panel mounted RJ45 socket? August 9, 2005, 11:25 am
tool to ease RJ45 termination April 17, 2007, 11:13 am
Wiring on RJ45 wall socket July 8, 2007, 6:22 am
RJ45 Cat5e cables - male one one end, female (keystone) on other July 21, 2005, 3:48 pm
DIY Ethernet September 10, 2004, 8:57 pm