LAN and Telecom Cabling Miswired Cable Works?

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Miswired Cable Works? Michael Quinlan 05-10-05
|--> Re: Miswired Cable Works? Robert Redelmei...05-10-05
`--> Re: Miswired Cable Works? Dmitri(Cabling-...05-10-05
Posted by Michael Quinlan on May 11, 2005, 7:42 am
Please log in for more thread options


That's exactly the way this installation appeared. All the work area
outlets were wired correctly, with the exception of one that had the
brown pair wired to a separate voice jack. However, at the patch
panel, the white-blue and blue-white were reversed, with the same
problem appearing on EVERY pair on EVERY cable. The only explaination
I can come up with is that the pair-separators on the punch down were
labled with the pair colors, but not with individual conductor colors,
and the installer had no idea which conductor went on which side of the
separator.

To clarify for anyone not following this mess, the wiremap results
were:

1 - 2
2 - 1
3 - 6
4 - 5
5 - 4
6 - 3
7 - 8
8 - 7

Obviously, the original installer did no testing, with the possible
exception of testing connectivity between two ethernet devices.

Thanks to all for the helpful replies.



Posted by James Knott on May 11, 2005, 12:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options


Michael Quinlan wrote:

> That's exactly the way this installation appeared.  All the work area
> outlets were wired correctly, with the exception of one that had the
> brown pair wired to a separate voice jack.  However, at the patch
> panel, the white-blue and blue-white were reversed, with the same
> problem appearing on EVERY pair on EVERY cable.

One thing to remember, is that the blue pair is not used for 10 & 100 Mb
ethernet. All 4 pairs are used for gigabit. So you could cut the blue
pair and it shouldn't affect networking.




Posted by Robert Redelmeier on May 11, 2005, 4:00 pm
Please log in for more thread options


> However, at the patch panel, the white-blue and blue-white
> were reversed, with the same problem appearing on EVERY pair
> on EVERY cable.

Ah, tip & ring were crossed over on every pair!

Not good practice! But it works for ethernet because the
signalling system looks for _changes_, not absolute levels.

> The only explaination I can come up with is that the
> pair-separators on the punch down were labled with the
> pair colors, but not with individual conductor colors,
> and the installer had no idea which conductor went on
> which side of the separator.

Very typical for 110 punchdowns.

-- Robert



Posted by Mark Evans on May 11, 2005, 6:40 pm
Please log in for more thread options


> > However, at the patch panel, the white-blue and blue-white
> > were reversed, with the same problem appearing on EVERY pair
> > on EVERY cable.

> Ah, tip & ring were crossed over on every pair!

> Not good practice! But it works for ethernet because the
> signalling system looks for _changes_, not absolute levels.

But can cause all sorts of interesting problems if the
link is used for for telecoms or V24.

> > The only explaination I can come up with is that the
> > pair-separators on the punch down were labled with the
> > pair colors, but not with individual conductor colors,
> > and the installer had no idea which conductor went on
> > which side of the separator.

> Very typical for 110 punchdowns.

If the connectors at both ends are from the same
manufacturer all that's necessary is that things
are done consistently.

Plenty of simple network testers will show if this
has happened.

--
Mark Evans
St. Peter's CofE Aided School
Phone: +44 1392 204764 X109
Fax: +44 1392 204763


Posted by James Knott on May 11, 2005, 11:59 am
Please log in for more thread options


David Lesher wrote:

>
>
>>What do you mean by "reversed pairs", if not cross over? It doesn't
>>matter what colour the wires are, so long as proper pairing is maintained.
>
> At one end, the blue-white is punched down where the white-blue
> should be and vice versa.

Shouldn't be a problem, as the signal is not polarity sensitive.



Similar ThreadsPosted
Miswired Cable Works? May 10, 2005, 8:17 am
OTDR: Launch Cable; Receive Cable April 10, 2008, 2:46 pm
Can I use a CAT5 cable as a TV Coax cable? October 14, 2006, 2:13 pm
Which end is bad of cable July 7, 2005, 10:51 pm
Cable Managers - 1U vs 2U August 12, 2004, 11:01 pm
Re Cable Managers - 1U vs 2U August 13, 2004, 10:28 am
What is the best way to strip Cat 5 cable November 27, 2004, 12:17 pm
Question about Cat 7 cable February 1, 2005, 2:03 pm
How long can a cable be February 21, 2005, 7:31 am
Cable labeler? April 22, 2005, 11:32 am
ISDN cable July 20, 2005, 11:29 am
Cable tester July 21, 2005, 12:07 am
Decent Cat 5/6 cable? July 21, 2005, 12:30 pm
cable picture November 29, 2005, 4:11 pm
cable picture November 29, 2005, 4:11 pm