CableIQ vs. SignalTEK vs. Validator
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Michael Quinlan on February 25, 2008, 10:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options true certifiers. It will only certify up to Cat5e, and I read that it can't be upgraded. Is there some other reason it's so (relatively) cheap? > > BTW - during my research I discovered that it is Ideal that bought
> > Wavetek. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Ed Nielsen on February 26, 2008, 12:33 pm
Please log in for more thread options go with Wavetek above any other manufacturer. Not that I have anything against Fluke, PentaScanner, etc., I have just been a big fan of Wavetek for 20+ years. I do have my concerns, though, since Ideal acquired that line. One place I looked at indicated that the LT8100A could "Easily upgrade to any LT 8000 Series cable tester." I have an E-mail into Ideal to find out. I'll let you know. CIAO! Ed N. Michael Quinlan wrote: > I noticed that the Wavetek LT8100A is less than 1/2 the price of other
> true certifiers. It will only certify up to Cat5e, and I read that it > can't be upgraded. Is there some other reason it's so (relatively) > cheap? > >> Ideal bought the network test equipment equipment division, Fluke bought
>> the voltage measurement division, and Acterna bought the RF measurement >> division. >> >> CIAO! >> >> Ed N. >> >> Michael Quinlan wrote: >>> BTW - during my research I discovered that it is Ideal that bought
>>> Wavetek. >
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| CableIQ vs. SignalTEK vs. Validator | February 9, 2008, 7:58 pm |
| fluke cableIQ. | June 21, 2006, 5:31 pm |
| Test-um Validator | February 13, 2006, 12:10 pm |
| Test-Um Validator | April 23, 2006, 5:09 pm |
| test-um Validator Nt950 | November 11, 2004, 9:28 am |
> the voltage measurement division, and Acterna bought the RF measurement
> division.
>
> CIAO!
>
> Ed N.
>
> Michael Quinlan wrote: