CableIQ vs. SignalTEK vs. Validator
Bookmark this page:
 Yahoo!
 Google
 Windows Live
 del.icio.us
 digg
 Netscape
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Michael Quinlan on February 9, 2008, 7:58 pm
Please log in for more thread options requirements of one of my repeat customers. I realize that none of these perform certification tests, but the customer has already stated that Validator is sufficient for their purposes, and I verified with them that CableIQ will also suffice. I would like to get some opinions on these units from people who have experience with them. In my research, I found a message from Carl Navarro leaning in the direction of the CableIQ because "it's a Fluke", and that he had "IQ envy". Do you still feel the same way Carl? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Ed Nielsen on February 12, 2008, 9:43 am
Please log in for more thread options opinion, either way you can't go wrong. CIAO! Ed N. Michael Quinlan wrote: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Carl Navarro on February 12, 2008, 10:07 am
Please log in for more thread options On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:58:54 -0800 (PST), Michael Quinlan
>I'm interested in purchasing a qualification tester to satisfy the
>requirements of one of my repeat customers. I realize that none of >these perform certification tests, but the customer has already stated >that Validator is sufficient for their purposes, and I verified with >them that CableIQ will also suffice. I would like to get some >opinions on these units from people who have experience with them. > >In my research, I found a message from Carl Navarro leaning in the >direction of the CableIQ because "it's a Fluke", and that he had "IQ >envy". Do you still feel the same way Carl? Yes, so I bought a PentaScanner. It's old, but trusty and it does the job I need it for. Besides, there's the Fluke software interface that most people accept. Now I'm saving my pennies forthe next level, a DSP-4000 family. Carl | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Michael Quinlan on February 21, 2008, 11:36 pm
Please log in for more thread options I ended up buying a CableIQ and am pretty happy with my purchase. For
more information on what went into this decision, take a look at http://my.opera.com/metroconnect Thanks for your input guys. BTW - during my research I discovered that it is Ideal that bought Wavetek. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Ed Nielsen on February 24, 2008, 1:17 am
Please log in for more thread options Ideal bought the network test equipment equipment division, Fluke bought
the voltage measurement division, and Acterna bought the RF measurement division. CIAO! Ed N. Michael Quinlan wrote: > BTW - during my research I discovered that it is Ideal that bought
> Wavetek. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Similar Threads | Posted |
| CableIQ vs. SignalTEK vs. Validator | February 9, 2008, 7:58 pm |
| fluke cableIQ. | June 21, 2006, 5:31 pm |
| Test-um Validator | February 13, 2006, 12:10 pm |
| Test-Um Validator | April 23, 2006, 5:09 pm |
| test-um Validator Nt950 | November 11, 2004, 9:28 am |
> requirements of one of my repeat customers. I realize that none of
> these perform certification tests, but the customer has already stated
> that Validator is sufficient for their purposes, and I verified with
> them that CableIQ will also suffice. I would like to get some
> opinions on these units from people who have experience with them.
>
> In my research, I found a message from Carl Navarro leaning in the
> direction of the CableIQ because "it's a Fluke", and that he had "IQ
> envy". Do you still feel the same way Carl?